Talk:Human rights in Argentina

Women's rights
There is a great need of referencing, adding and improving in the article. This is barely a stub. The problems with pornography and prostitution are widespread and well known in Argentina, visible to the man on the street. Very little documentation in that area however.Willuconquer (talk) 21:49, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * There is prostitution in every nation in the world, including many without machismo, eg nations in Europe. Your reference simply states that machismo exists in Argentina and that it is protrayed on television.  It makes no analysis of how that male-dominant philosophy is responsible for  "marital rape, widespread pornography and teenaged female prostitution" as is in the article.  To draw that conclusion is synthesis and not permitted.  You have to provide a reliable reference to support that statement directly because otherwise it draws a big conclusion that may not be accurate.--MartinezMD (talk) 05:03, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Suspicion that large chunks have been copied from elsewhere
Apart from the single source that seems to be used, googling phrases turns up suspicious results. Tony  (talk)  08:27, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Copyright violation
I have searched for two sentences from this article and found them in and. These are from the US Department of State, presumably not a site that can be freely copied from. I am therefore tagging this as a copyvio. --Greenmaven (talk) 03:14, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

This sentence "During the 1990s, some laws began to tackle domestic violence, by empowering police agencies and provincial judicial authorities to establish preventive measures", and others, have been lifted from Women in Argentina. This was the second edit for the article - so even its earliest versions were plagued by copyright violation. --Greenmaven (talk) 03:38, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

I have been advised that the US Department of State website is a public domain source. The originator of this article, and the editor who added most of the cut'n'paste material has added plagiarised info in other articles. I will leave the CSD tag on this article so that an admin can review the article and make a decision. --Greenmaven (talk) 04:09, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I declined the speedy delete due to the Copyright status of work by the U.S. government as being in the public domain. If you believe this article has other significant problems or that there is an exception to the usual public domain status of U.S. government works that applies here, you can nominate the article for deletion at WP:AFD. But that should require a full deletion discussion, not a speedy deletion. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:13, 2 March 2012 (UTC)