Talk:Human rights in the separatist controlled areas of Ukraine

Suggestion for expansion
Since this has been split off, this article could be expanded with the info on the deteriorating situation of the Tatars in Russian occupied Crimea.  Volunteer Marek  08:20, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Oh yes, I think that was excellent move. "Human rights in the separatist controlled areas of Ukraine" is a more general and reasonable subject. My very best wishes (talk) 16:32, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * It's too vague. This article only seems to deal with the DPR, and should be at "Human rights in the Donetsk People's Republic". By the way, keep in mind that we have an article already on the Humanitarian situation during the war in Donbass, so this article should avoid overlap. It should only deal with actions of the Republic in a non-combat context. Crimean stuff should not go here, as lumping together a piece of Russia with these Donbass republics is a bit queer. Human rights in Crimea should be dealt with at the Republic of Crimea page, which isn't long, and which is more appropriate.  RGloucester  — ☎ 17:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I would support a merger to Humanitarian situation during the war in Donbass, but "Human rights in the Donetsk People's Republic" is clearly a POV title, making an attempt at legitimizing the entity. What's next "Tourism in Donetsk People's Republic"?  Volunteer Marek   17:57, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, exactly. How about merger with Humanitarian situation during the war in Donbass under the general title used in this page? There is a significant content overlap of Humanitarian situation during the war in Donbass with this article. In addition, I disagree with this: "Crimean stuff should not go here, as lumping together a piece of Russia with these Donbass republics is a bit queer." No, this is not a piece of Russia, according to majority of RS and international organizations. Hence it may go here, although I do not insist that it must. My very best wishes (talk) 17:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * You fellows are playing with words. I never said anything about the "legitimacy" of the Republic, or of the annexation of Crimea. I'm merely speaking in terms of de facto realities, which we have no control over. I'm opposed to a merger, as most of this stuff hasn't anything to do with the war. The best thing to do would be to revert the split go back to where we started. Just to note Republic of Crimea has a section on Tatar rights abuses already. One can add the appropriate stuff there. RGloucester  — ☎ 18:30, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with it being put back in the original article as well.  Volunteer Marek   18:48, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * If we actually want to create a new article, or split something off, we should discuss it at the DPR article first, so we know what we are doing. This no-consensus split was poorly carried out, and person that did it didn't even bother to clean-up this new "article". Let's go back to the DPR article, and decide what we want to do. RGloucester  — ☎ 18:50, 13 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Considering that it was not discussed, I consider that the section should be restored to the DPR article. To be honest, I'm hardly convinced that it warranted a split. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:51, 15 November 2014 (UTC)