Talk:Human tooth/GA1

GA Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

I wouldn't class this article as 'complete', as says next to nothing about the evolution or fossil record of teeth [I've made a rather paltry start], and its coverage seems to me to be far too anthropocentric - especially in the images department. The over-analysis of human teeth detracts from the focus of the article. Martin  (Smith609 – Talk)  06:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * That's generally a problem on this wiki. Adding non-human info to articles sometimes results in reversals with the edit summary "not important" (I'm not talking about this article). What can you do, we drive other species to extinction. Xasodfuih (talk) 07:49, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * There is an article on [Tooth (animal)|non-human teeth] already, which would be a great location for more information about teeth in animals. Further, I think the in-depth information on the anatomy, function, and diseases of teeth is important to ensuring the article is complete. About adding some information on the fossil record of teeth- I say the more, the merrier. - Dozenist talk  14:11, 25 February 2009 (UTC)