Talk:Human uses of animals/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Icebob99 (talk · contribs) 16:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be doing the review. I'll list a section with any concerns that must be addressed, as well as a section with my optional suggestions.

GA criteria concerns
Nothing stands out.

Suggestions

 * In the second sentence of the lead: animals provide much of the meat consumed by the human population? I can't think of any meat that doesn't come from animals; perhaps reword that.
 * Article is of sufficiently broad coverage for GA status, but it is only 8kB readable prose, and I think 10kB is a good target to aim for. It certainly doesn't fail for my arbitrary preference, and it's more of an A class standard anyway, but expansion at this stage is always a good thing.

Checking against the criteria:
 * 1) Well written: good layout, well-wikilinked
 * 2) Verifiable: All the references check out and everything is referenced with inline citations (above GA standards)
 * 3) Broad: Good broadness, doesn't go into needless detail. See optional suggestion about expansion.
 * 4) Neutral: Good neutrality maintained.
 * 5) Stable: edit history looks good.
 * 6) Images: lot of them! Licensing looks good.

Good job on the article. I'm marking this as having officially passed. Congratulations! Icebob99 (talk) 16:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Many thanks for the review. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:40, 21 December 2016 (UTC)