Talk:Humane Society International Australia

Promotional tone
While the copyeditors of this article should be commended for their work, the tone of the article was clearly intended to promote the subject in a non-encyclopedic manner. I will continue to monitor the page, which desperately needs citations, but future copyeditors need to ensure that they don't misuse Wikipedia for the objectives of HSI Australia. Thanks. Regards,--Soulparadox (talk) 09:02, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

"Organisation" or "Organization" - explanation of revert
I have just made this edit; with summary Reverting good faith edit by IP editor; per WP:MOS, MOS:ENGVAR & MOS:TIES this article should follow Australian standard spellings for "organisation", "scrutinise" is in the title of the source.

This article concerns an Australian organisation, and we should use the local, Australian version of English. Please see WP:MOS, MOS:ENGVAR & MOS:TIES for supporting policy & guidelines.

This is the second time that such changes have been made & reverted. Per WP:BRD, editors wishing to use a non-local, US version of English are invited to discuss the reasoning here. - Ryk72 'c.s.n.s.' 01:45, 17 February 2015 (UTC)