Talk:Hume Lake

the tone of the page contains more emotionality on logging (and apparent emphasis) than is necessary. Link to logging issues would be more appropriate. P3 wording 'implement'(under main) is odd/incorrect. P2 under 'history' -no reference to the 'illegal' commentary. P3 under 'history' contains similar charged wording. >'infamous' 'feverish' 'almost complete destruction' etc. Never like to see "arguably" in a wiki page. Vote to keep page due to history and use but the History sections needs a serious rewrite. Xxam.mmm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xxam.mmm (talk • contribs) 18:56, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

In addition to the less than neutral tone already mentioned, much of this article pertains more to the Hume-Bennett Lumber Company and Draft:Hume Lake Christian Camps than it does the lake itself. I suggest moving these sections to their appropriate pages and replacing some portions with more neutral content already in place on those pages. – Jon Adams (talk) 03:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

from Vfd
On 26 Feb 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Votes for deletion/Hume lake for a record of the discussion.