Talk:Hummingbird Heartbeat/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 07:21, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Checking against GA Criteria
✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ✅ ❌ I don't really see the problem, it finishes the sentence smoothly. Do you have any suggestions of what to change it to?
 * taken from her second mainstream studio album Teenage Dream (2010) --> it's her third studio album, let's not beat around the bush.
 *  Christopher "Tricky" Stewart; with the latter --> incorrect use of semi-colon
 * songs --> song's
 * The song was inspired by --> repetition of 'the song' from previous sentence, and is name is Russell not Russel.
 * Link music critics
 * ..many of which --> many of whom
 * ..peaking at 124, respectively --> 'respectively'? Seriously?
 * You don't see the problem? 'Respectively' is used when referring to two or more items, in this case there is only one chart position of South Korea.


 * According to digital sheet music published at Musicnotes.com by Sony-ATV Music Publishing --> unnecessary
 * MTV News should NOT be in italics
 * The lead sentence of the reception section needs a bit of a copyedit.
 * As said before, 'the song' is a bit repetitive.
 * ..said the song fit well with the original --> fit?
 * ..and if released as a single, would help Perry be the only artist with six number-one singles on the Billboard Hot 100 --> I don't find this necessary here, it's just a bit out of place
 * Why is there no mention of the song charting?
 * About.com and MTV News should not be in italics
 * Ref #10, Capitol Records does not belong there. It should be iTunes Store and Apple Inc.
 * Why is there no mention in the article's body that the song was inspired by Russell Brand?
 * The article is ABSOLUTELY NOT broad in its coverage.

Overall

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This is an extremely short article. On hold to see if some serious improvements can be made. Till 07:46, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * As some of the issues haven't been addressed in the 8-day period, including a decent expansion, I'm failing this GAN. The article can be renominated at any time but I would suggest fixing these issues. Thanks. Till 00:44, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * This is an extremely short article. On hold to see if some serious improvements can be made. Till 07:46, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * As some of the issues haven't been addressed in the 8-day period, including a decent expansion, I'm failing this GAN. The article can be renominated at any time but I would suggest fixing these issues. Thanks. Till 00:44, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * This is an extremely short article. On hold to see if some serious improvements can be made. Till 07:46, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
 * As some of the issues haven't been addressed in the 8-day period, including a decent expansion, I'm failing this GAN. The article can be renominated at any time but I would suggest fixing these issues. Thanks. Till 00:44, 17 August 2012 (UTC)