Talk:Hundred Years' War, 1369–1389

Untitled
I didnt get past the opening paragraph. It was very heavily biased to the point of distraction. My main problem was this line:"His less capable successor, Charles VI, made peace with the less capable son of the Black Prince, Richard II, in 1389", so I changed it by omitting the words 'less capable' from the text68.33.161.17 (talk) 21:41, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

I am not sure if this is the right way or form to post my doubts, but du Guesclin fought in SIX not two major battles, Cocherel, Auray, Najera, Montiel (debatable), Pontvallain and Chiset, and won 4 of 6, strongly leaning towards the Fabian strategy, but not always declining open battle, so what the current site says is wrong

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Hundred Years' War (1337–1360) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:44, 31 May 2018 (UTC)

Forward, retreat, forward halfway!
How is it that there is a section covering Treaty of Bruges and years 1375-1380, _then_ a section John of Gaunt's Great Chevauchée covering year 1373, _then_ a section The Great Schism and year 1378. This kind of hashed-up history makes me distrust the whole article. It is thrown together by spasmodic editing? Shenme (talk) 01:39, 25 March 2020 (UTC)