Talk:Hungarian Alliance (Slovak political party)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... (your reason here) --Igec133 (talk) 12:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

It is a page for the newly formed coalition of Hungarian parties in Slovakia, which has over 5% in the polls.pollsparty--Igec133 (talk) 12:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

MKÖ-MKS
In what way are they the same? Alliance is a political party, MKÖ-MKS only included SMK-MKP and MF but the latter left? Braganza (talk) 08:16, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

Restructuring
Összefogás was founded as a platform to unite the Hungarian parties and MKÖ-MKS was an electoral alliance disguised as party so they didn't need the 7% threshold, the article is written like Összefogás absorbed MKP & Hid which isn't the case. Alliance was a merger of MKP & Bridge but Bridge left and was refounded (and there was no important election during the time) and Alliance now is dominated by the MKP faction (which still exists within in the party) and is ideologically identical. So i propose MKP & Alliance and rename the history section.

I already started a similar request on German wikipedia  where i went to more detail but i did not get much reaction too it. Braganza (talk) 14:55, 29 July 2023 (UTC)


 * I disagree with the merge since the party still has two factions – Magyar Közösségi Összefogás and SMK–MKP. It's also possible that in the future they will cooperate with another minority party.--CaeCalig (talk) 15:56, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * maybe cooperating in the future doesn't matter
 * and Összefogás is pretty small and not unique enough to make a real difference between Alliance & SMK–MKP Braganza (talk) 16:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I support the restructuring, for what I'm reading there's a true mess in what respects the Hungarian minority parties and their coalitions so the restructuring to make it into less articles that better explain the mergers and dissolutions (especially if the other parties are supersmall) makes sense. Tidjani Saleh (talk) 08:47, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * i made a first draft for a merger User:Braganza/MKP Braganza (talk) 09:38, 3 August 2023 (UTC)
 * support
 * Panam2014 (talk) 21:07, 5 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Support. This does look generally better structured Quinby  ( talk ) 18:16, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I fully support the restructuring proposal, with all due respects, the page is currently a mess. I’d propose, minimally, a massive reorganisation of the page because it is difficult to truly be informed with a page like this. Lexoomfie (talk) 09:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

i will merge them in 24 hours, so if any of you have something to add, do it now Braganza (talk) 17:35, 18 August 2023 (UTC)


 * pings
 * Braganza (talk) 15:58, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Braganza (talk) 14:11, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
 * because you took part in the German discussion Braganza (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2023 (UTC)