Talk:Hungry Like the Wolf/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

This article is in really good shape. Take a look at my minor changes to make sure they are OK. Other than that, two quick things and we're done!

Under Writing and recording:
 * At the end of the first paragraph, you say, "...by the evening it was essentially complete. They re-recorded the song for the Rio album a few months later." But then in the next two paragraphs after that, you talk more about the recording of the song. Can you add this bit to the end of the third paragraph instead, to make it more chronological?

Under Music Video:
 * "The video was lush and cinematic, with shots of jungles, rivers, elephants, cafes and marketplaces evoking the atmosphere of the film Raiders of the Lost Ark." Can you attribute this statement to the person who said it? Otherwise, it reads a little POV ("lush and cinematic") and it sounds like you're making the Raiders connection yourself, which borders on "original research" and is forbidden in a Wikipedia article.

Nice work. --Hunter Kahn (talk) 17:25, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

A good article is:
 * 1) Well-written: Prose is good, MOS is good.
 * 2) Factually accurate and verifiable: Sources are good, no original research.
 * 3) Broad in its coverage: Addresses main aspects, no unneeded detail.
 * 4) Neutral: Yes.
 * 5) Stable: Yes.
 * 6) Illustrated, if possible, by images: Yes.

--Hunter Kahn (talk) 03:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC)