Talk:Hunter's Creek, Florida

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Hunter's Creek, Florida. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130911234518/http://factfinder2.census.gov to http://factfinder2.census.gov

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:08, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 7 October 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved   -- Calidum  16:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

Hunter's Creek, Florida → Hunters Creek, Florida – The place name, under USGS rules is Hunters Creek, no apostrophe. The article itself admits that fact. If the article is for a CDP, the official CDP name should be used, not the one used by a planned development within the CDP. Arecaceæ2011 (talk) 06:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Wikipedia's article title policy is to use common names, not to follow some governmental authority's preference. The U.S. government has a hostile attitude toward apostrophes. Wikipedia should not. Moreover, when sources are mixed, Wikipedia's preference is to use the form that most resembles ordinary English formatting, and the form that is most natural in English is the one with the apostrophe. —&#8288;&#8202;&#8288;BarrelProof (talk) 03:01, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak oppose: The USGS is not always correct when it comes to naming and they do have procedures to correct namings. The Census Board uses USGS as established names and again, they are usually open to name changes. An example I can think of personally is Fish Hawk, Florida on the talk page which might be something I need to review again. – The Grid  ( talk )  12:34, 8 October 2021 (UTC)