Talk:Hunter: The Reckoning – Wayward/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MrAureliusR (talk · contribs) 18:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

The lead is good, though the second sentence might be re-written to be less of an exact duplicate of the Gameplay section. The rest of the article is well-written, I don't see any glaring spelling or grammatical errors.

The one screenshot is not particularly illustrative of gameplay -- it's a bit dark and rather hard to tell what is actually happening, but this could be easily improved with a new screenshot.

The article avoids going into excessive detail, which is good. The gameplay section *might* benefit from a little bit more detail on game mechanics, but that's mostly nitpicking. Adding some comparisons to the previous games in the series might be a future expansion area.

Citations are generally good and seem to be from reliable sources (respected and well-known video-game journals, etc). I don't see any obvious copyright violations, a quick search with Earwig's copyvio tool shows no obvious violations.

Overall, I would say this article meets the criteria for Good article status, with possible revisions as noted.  M r A urelius R  Talk! 18:46, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reviewing it so quickly. I have made changes according to your suggestions, although the gameplay of this game is rather basic and almost identical to HTR1's - I didn't want to go into too much detail, to avoid coming off as a manual for the game, but I did add in a "See also" that links to the first game's article.--AlexandraIDV 21:25, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * The new screenshot is way better! And the other edits are great. Seriously good job! Also, it's odd that the bot didn't pick up on the review passing -- the plugins I have did show that it was a good article, but it didn't have the little good article symbol at the top right so something odd happened.  M r A urelius R   Talk! 21:32, 8 August 2020 (UTC)