Talk:Hunyadi family/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jonas Vinther (talk · contribs) 15:49, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

a. the prose is clear and concise, it respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct
 * Well-written Symbol support vote.svg

b. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation


 * The article is wonderfully written. I found a few sentence or grammar mistakes which I corrected myself as I read the article.

a. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
 * Verifiable with no original research Symbol support vote.svg

b. It provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines

c. It contains no original research
 * The article mostly uses book or journal sources which are referenced with Harvard templates. All the sources contain the necessary information.

a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic
 * Broad in its coverage Symbol support vote.svg

b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
 * The article is very broad in its coverage, stays on topic and does not go into unnecessary detail.

It represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each
 * Neutral Symbol support vote.svg
 * The article is neutral and does not included personal opinions or statements.

It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
 * Stable Symbol support vote.svg
 * The article is stable and its content does not change significantly from day to day (edits made in the face of the GA-nomination will be ignored). Neither is there any edit wars or content disputes.

a. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content
 * Illustrated Symbol support vote.svg

b. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
 * The article is nicely illustrated with eight images all of which contain the necessary information.


 * Pass, fail or hold? Symbol support vote.svg
 * With the article meeting the GA-criteria I'm of course going to pass it. Nice job people. :) Jonas Vinther (speak to me!) 16:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)