Talk:Huoratron

Untitled
This entire article has been written with dramatic wording, as if he were being advertised to the reader, rather than being objectively described. It would be nice if someone addressed this at some point, perhaps just adjust the wording to have less... adjectives.

This is straight-up PR copy. No objectivity whatsoever. Huoatron is great but this article is shambolic.109.144.162.180 (talk) 20:49, 26 July 2014 (UTC)