Talk:Hurricane Abby (1960)

Reference formatting non-uniform
This is bound to come up at GAN, but make sure the publishing dates are in a uniform location throughout your referencing. I see two formats being used in this regard. One should be chosen throughout the article. Thegreatdr (talk) 18:02, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Abby (1960). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110525183031/http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1960.pdf to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/general/lib/lib1/nhclib/mwreviews/1960.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:30, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 25 May 2024

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (non-admin closure) Safari Scribe Edits! Talk! 00:18, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Hurricanes Abby and Celeste → Hurricane Abby (1960) – The storm page was moved earlier this year to accommodate Hurricane Celeste, a storm that was not notable at all, without any discussion at all regarding it. The reason given was solely because Celeste directly formed from the remnants of Abby. I think this is a poor excuse to move an storm article like this because for example, you have Hurricane Francelia, of which its remnants contributed to Hurricane Glenda in the Eastern Pacific, and it only mentions that idea once throughout the article without any other content of the other hurricane. Plus, there is not enough information on Celeste to warrant a merge of both storms, as the overwhelming majority of the article talks about Abby. What I'm saying is, just because a storm is connected to another does not automatically mean to have both storms into one article, and this is why the move was carried out prematurely. I'm doing this not only because I think the move should be reverted, but because I want to see if there actually even is support for the current article name. ~  Sandy 14156   ( Talk ✉️ )  21:16, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support. The move was done by a now-blocked user, for what it's worth. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 21:22, 25 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Support. The two systems-one article setup only applies in two cases: when the low-level circulation center survives the crossing (e.g. Cesar-Douglas, Irene-Olivia, Joan-Miriam), in line with NHC after they stopped renaming crossover storms; or when the impacts of two associated systems overlap and cannot be distinguished (e.g. Judy and Kevin, Amanda and Cristobal). Neither apply here: impacts are solely from Abby, and the claim of direct regeneration is questionable (the MWR source only states "some remnants" of Abby contributed to the formation of Celeste). ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 13:49, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.