Talk:Hurricane Beta/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hello Cyclonebiskit.

I will be reviewing this article for GA, i should have the review up within a couple of hours.Jason Rees (talk) 22:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * 1) ) Add a link to Rapid deepening in the lead
 * 2) ) La Barra del Rio Grande is a red link, which needs to be sorted.
 * 3) ) Move the table to the Hondrass section and move the Rainfall image to the top.

Ive done a Copyedit and i am now satisfied when these things are corrected, the Article can be passed Jason Rees (talk) 23:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Passed Article since the above items were done to my satisfaction.Jason Rees (talk) 23:49, 16 January 2009 (UTC)