Talk:Hurricane Boris (1996)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I feel this is ready for GA. I have worked for the last month on it and gave it two copyedits. Leave Message ,Yellow Evan home, User:Yellow Evan/Sandbox


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

Passed. -- An ' ha ' mi  rak  14:40, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images havefair use rationales): b(appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images havefair use rationales): b(appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: