Talk:Hurricane Celia (2010)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: YE  Tropical   Cyclone This is an excellent article (I read it many many times since it was created), but I noted two issues. The first one was the image infobox is not of peak intensity, when there is one available and is listed. another problem is technically false info because did not Celia meet the criteria for rapid deeping it meet explosive deeping(unless I calculated it incorrectly). Good luck making those three minor improvements. The article is being placed on hold for 168 hours. YE  Tropical   Cyclone  14:07, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I hate and was extremely hesitant,but I have too fail the article. I strongly disagree with the consensuses, but oh well. There is nothing you can do about it. Oh well. I have assed it at B class though, but this still meets the GA criteria 5 of the 6 GA criteria. when It goes back to GAN, I am ready for review and will likely pass this article. YE  Tropical   Cyclone  18:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Just a note about the main image, it's the best MODIS image available for the storm so it's preferable over the lower resolution (and quality) IR image when Celia was a Category 5. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 19:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)