Talk:Hurricane Charley (1986)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review (see here for criteria)
 * This is a nice little article. I have been through it and find nothing to criticize. I enjoyed reading it.

Congratuations! Nicely done.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): Clearly written b (MoS): Follows the relevant parts of MoS
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): Well referenced b (citations to reliable sources): The sources are reliable  c (OR): No OR
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): Covers the broad areas b (focused): Remains focused on article topic
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias: Neutral
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.: Stable
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 18:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC)