Talk:Hurricane Cindy tornado outbreak

Todo
Expand the lead, add in-line references, include a brief summary of the hurricane, but other than that, a decent start. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  20:43, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * This looks primarily like a list. Shouldn't the article be renamed?  Thegreatdr (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It does indeed appear to be a list, but I've seen lists named without the "List of...", so given how long the title of this article is already, I think it should be fine. Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  23:08, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Still working on it. Just wanted to get the bulk of the work saved. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:48, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've updated the lead, added a summary of the event, and added a section on the Atlanta Motor Speedway tornado. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:04, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 one external links on 2005 Hurricane Cindy tornado outbreak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/pdf/TCR-AL032005_Cindy.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012115316/http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov:80/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~ShowEvent~588352 to http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~ShowEvent~588352
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080328072232/http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~storms to http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~storms
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080328072232/http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~storms to http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~storms
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080328072232/http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~storms to http://www4.ncdc.noaa.gov/cgi-win/wwcgi.dll?wwevent~storms

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:37, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Merge
This outbreak wasn’t very notable and Cindy’s article is quite short, it could be easily merged. If kept, I suggest it just be the Atlanta motor speedway tornado, similar to the 2013 Hattiesburg tornado 108.170.65.170 (talk) 14:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Strong oppose. A merge is not needed. It’s fine as it is. The system produced numerous tornadoes and a merge is unnecessary. IBlazeCat (talk) 23:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, but just because a system produces many tornadoes doesn’t mean it should be kept. And I think a merge is necessary because it would beef up the Cindy article which has low content currently. 108.170.65.170 (talk) 23:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * However, merging this would cause us to have to describe every tornado and its location in the article, which would MASSIVE influx of information that is better off left in a separate article. ChessEric (talk · contribs) 06:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * But we can always just add the tornado chart as Hink said. Merging doesn’t mean we can’t do that. Then we keep all the info and not make a fork. Win win! 38.108.217.140 (talk) 21:07, 17 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Support – Both articles are kind of short, and I don't see a good reason why the tornado outbreak should have a separate article, given its length. As I've said before elsewhere, it's better to have as much information as possible on a given subject in one place. It's better to have one strong article than two or three weak ones. I think it would be a good idea to merge this article into Cindy's article, as that would produce a stronger, more comprehensive article, as opposed to what we have right now. All of the other hurricanes with tornado outbreak articles were lengthy articles that needed a content fork. This isn't one of them.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 21:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Since you first suggested this merger a while back, I think you would be interested in this discussion.  Light and Dark2000  🌀 (talk) 21:03, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge - the content can easily fit in the main storm article. I felt the same way when I proposed it back in 2018. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 03:00, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose I think there is enough information here to keep it. We still don't have a Tornadoes of 2005 list page for tornadoes so I think we should revisit this topic once that happens. There were 44 tornadoes here and I do not believe merging it would do the outbreak justice. ChessEric (talk · contribs) 06:48, 17 February 2022 (UTC)