Talk:Hurricane Cosme (1989)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Crowz  RSA  14:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Meteorological history
 * However, it was characterized by favorable outflow and banding. - reads poorly, consider rewording.
 * Operationally, the storm was not named until several hours later - Ref one doesn't back this up.
 * June 21;[2] this.. perhaps exchange semi-colon for period.
 * it reached maximum sustained winds of 85 mph (140 km/h) both "mph" and "km/h" should be linked.
 * Add link to "barometric pressure" as well.
 * During the night of June 21 perhaps exchange "the night" for a time-span (e.g. "From hours eight to twelve...")


 * Preparations and impact
 * Mexican officials evacuated nearly 260 people Personally I think it should be spelt out, but per WP:ORDINAL it is not required.
 * flash flood watches and warnings were issued. [7]  there should not be a space between the ref and period.
 * I have addressed these issues. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home


 * Forgotten comments....
 * weakening into a tropical storm shortly after coming ashore..[2] - two periods
 * High winds produced by the storm knocked down numerous trees and power lines throughout the affected areas. - instead of "knocked down", maybe use "damaged" or "struck"
 * The highest rainfall recorded in relation to Cosme was 16.1 in (410 mm) in Yautepec San Bartolo, Mexico - change "Yautepec San Bartolo" to "San Bartolo Yautepec" add link to it.
 * Many adobe homes were destroyed, but a specific cost of damage is unknown. - change "a" to "the"
 * flash flood watches and warnings were issued. [7]  - still should not be a space between the ref and period.
 * I have addressed these issues. Leave Message, Yellow Evan home


 * Result

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc: [[Image:Symbol support vote double.png|16px]]
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - Pass.
 * Wow, this is a short, but impressive article. Only a few minor errors that were fixed quickly. Great job finding sources. I have passed the article. Great job!! Crowz  RSA  22:49, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc: [[Image:Symbol support vote double.png|16px]]
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - Pass.
 * Wow, this is a short, but impressive article. Only a few minor errors that were fixed quickly. Great job finding sources. I have passed the article. Great job!! Crowz  RSA  22:49, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - Pass.
 * Wow, this is a short, but impressive article. Only a few minor errors that were fixed quickly. Great job finding sources. I have passed the article. Great job!! Crowz  RSA  22:49, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Wow, this is a short, but impressive article. Only a few minor errors that were fixed quickly. Great job finding sources. I have passed the article. Great job!! Crowz  RSA  22:49, 9 May 2010 (UTC)