Talk:Hurricane Dalilia

Orphaned references in Hurricane Dalilia (1989)
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Hurricane Dalilia (1989)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "CPHC": From 1989 Pacific hurricane season:  From Tropical cyclone:  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:14, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Requested move 8 February 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Procedural close. Request opened by block-evader. Neil N  talk to me 18:00, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Hurricane Dalilia (1989) → Hurricane Dalilia – Only one hurricane named "Dalilia". 219.79.250.146 (talk) 01:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. Sky  Warrior  02:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Technically, yes, but in this instance, the name Dalilia was a typo from when the EPHC transferred the storm name list to the NHC, so I'd argue that the intended version of the name was a hurricane in 2013 and 2001. YE Pacific Hurricane  16:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. No need for disambiguation. Laurdecl talk 07:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose per YE. Hurricane Dalilia redirects to Tropical Storm Dalila, and some of the other Dalilas may have been more notable than this Dalilia. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:59, 15 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 21 February 2018

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Page moved. (non-admin closure)  samee  talk 06:07, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

Hurricane Dalilia (1989) → Hurricane Dalilia – Only one storm named "Dalilia" reach hurricane strength. B dash (talk) 02:51, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Technically, yes, but in this instance, the name Dalilia was a typo from when the EPHC transferred the storm name list to the NHC, so I'd argue that the intended version of the name was a hurricane in 2013 and 2001. YE Pacific Hurricane 8:55 am, 9 February 2017, Thursday (1 year, 11 days ago) (UTC−8)
 * Oppose non reader helpful for an event. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:06, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Support Unnecessary disambiguation. Wrongly implying there is another hurricane with this name, as the current title does, is NOT helpful to anyone. --В²C ☎ 02:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Given that the name was only named such due to a typo, I'd argue that this is a special case. YE Pacific Hurricane  03:02, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Classic case for WP:SMALLDETAILS and WP:TWODABS - each is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC of its respective actual name, and can have a hat link to the other. --В²C ☎ 17:26, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Support As the only topic of this name, no need for disambiguation. The hatnote is sufficient for those who are seeking another topic by a different name.--Yaksar (let's chat) 05:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.