Talk:Hurricane Dolly (1996)

Merge
Not notable enough, and too little info. I vote for a merger. Hurricanehink 19:47, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * This one is slightly more than a stub I think...if the impact section could be tripled with interesting information, it could live. Otherwise, no. Jdorje 20:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I vote merge. No impact information exists beyond the basics. All the new information here could easily fit into the main article. -- §  Hurricane ERIC§ archive -- my dropsonde 03:28, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * The article already says what is in the Tropical Cyclone report, and I doubt there is much more. The storm just didn't do that much. Hurricanehink 14:21, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Added more information Storm05 18:19, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * All you did was add a death table, write the uncertainty of the death toll, and explained indirect/direct deaths. Still vote merge. Hurricanehink 22:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I concur. -- §  Hurricane ERIC§ archive -- my dropsonde 14:26, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

Todo 2
It's pretty good so far. A copyedit is needed all around. Some sections could be elaborated further. For example, the Texas section. Was the rainfall directly from Dolly's outer bands, or was it from Dolly's moisture? Also, could you get some damage info? Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)