Talk:Hurricane Elida (2008)

Todo
I don't really know what to add! I'll give it a C until someone else sees it because I think it is very good. --Rose09 Rashmi   Next  20:05, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Haha, I'm missing it's movement and reasoning for movement. I'm going to add that now. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:10, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Movement added in Cyclonebiskit (talk) 20:57, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Looks good for the most part. The storm history is a tad excessive, though. Try to condense it a little bit. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  20:59, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

What parts should remove to shorten it? Cyclonebiskit (talk) 21:01, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Meteorological history of Hurricane Elida
Since the MH is very long, should I make a sub-article for the history? Or just leave it be? Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:39, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Do it.Leave Message orYellow Evan home 14:13, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd much rather prefer someone who has a good history as an editor to give their opinions on this. Not someone who has been ridiculed extensively. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:19, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd say it's fine as it is. First of all, there's been an overall, albeit unofficial, agreement on IRC to limit the Meteorological history subarticles to the more notable storms that affected land. In this case, if a met. history were created, a good chunk of this article would have to be removed to avoid redundant information. Without a long storm history, this article would have little sustenance. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  15:26, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks JC. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 17:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)