Talk:Hurricane Florence (1994)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I will be assessing Hurricane Florence --Elena85 1959 Pacific   Hurricane Season  22:55, 20 November 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Is good and contains a brief storm history.


 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Checks out okay!


 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * Works out well


 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * Good
 * Good

Yes
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * I've Passed the article, it is great! --Elena85 1959 Pacific   Hurricane Season  23:00, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * P.S.- I am a fast reader if you are wondering why I did this so quick.
 * Wow, very fast, 5 min. :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 23:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)