Talk:Hurricane Frances/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

After a long delay, the article is now well-referenced, and is being submitted for GAC/GAR/GAN. Thegreatdr (talk) 13:14, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

And after another long delay because of backlog, it's getting reviewed. :D This is the longest I've reviewed so far and since today is a school day, the review might not be out until 5pm (EST). But, it will most likely be out this morning. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 11:13, 6 October 2008 (UTC)


 * 1) Well Written
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) Factually Accurate
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * There's only one minor ding with the references, number 16 has no author, publisher, date of access and what not. Otherwise there is nothing wrong with them, but if you want to go further with this article, it's best you put the reference names for refs 1, 3, 4, 17, and 24 in lowercase.
 * 1) '''Neutral point of view.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Stability
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Great job on bringing back this article! I only found one tiny thing with a reference, you need to put the author, date of access, publisher and the other things like the rest of the references. Once that's done I'll pass the article :) Cyclonebiskit (talk) 11:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I just fixed the little thing for you, it was silly to wait to fix something that minor. It passes for GA now Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:16, 6 October 2008 (UTC)