Talk:Hurricane Georgette (1992)

Merge?
Does this really need an article? It was a marginal C2 hurricane that did very little. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 22:48, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Long story short, maybe. I do feel there is some significant content in here; however, I was reluctant to move this article to the mainspace. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  23:19, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't think enough to warrant its own article though. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 23:57, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Anyone else have any thoughts on this one? I have mixed feelings on this one,and I doubt they will ever be a consensus to merge or keep at this rate. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  15:10, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * What exactly are your mixed feelings? There isn't much content here. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 15:52, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The season article is kinda long and is nearly 10,000 words though and I plan on making it longer sooner or later. Hence, I am not sure merging it to the season section will do any good. However, I have not yet checked the word count of this article. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  21:56, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The article is comparable in the length to many active era EPAC articles (though somewhat shorter than the others). YE  Pacific   Hurricane  22:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, that is more of a testament to there being too many EPAC articles that shouldn't, rather than this article having enough to warrant one. There was minimal land impact, and the MH wasn't special. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 23:46, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Not really. For me, I'm still deciding whether there is enough content for an article. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  01:00, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Merge – There is nothing in this article that cannot be effectively transported to its current storm section. The Preparations and Impact section is pitiful and the article has a whole does not meet notability requirements. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 01:01, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If you don't think this article is worth having, then don't read it. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  01:57, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * That's not really a reason to keep it. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Yea, but it should not have been treated as such. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  02:18, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, what is the reason it should be kept? --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 02:20, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Content, which I am still not sure about. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  02:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * But it's short. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 03:11, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * After additional trimming, Georgette is the shortest EPAC active era article. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  14:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, there you go. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 14:14, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, merged. YE  Pacific   Hurricane  14:50, 22 September 2012 (UTC)