Talk:Hurricane Hector (2018)

Copy Editing Discussion
Could someone please clarify what the issues are in this article? I honestly saw very few spelling/grammatical mistakes when I checked it. I didn't really see much in terms of flow problems either. Figfires Send me a message! 17:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC) wait where did u find this out Derpdadoodle (talk) 00:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

New picture
Can someone please get a new picture for this storm? The picture is seriously outdated. Brandontracker (talk) 1:50, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
 * im on it. Derpdadoodle (talk) 19:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Subsections: Yes or no?
I have noticed we are fighting about whether or not to have subsections in this article. Personally, with the way the merge proposal is going, we should have subsections as it appears the article will be kept. The subsections will allow editors to write and readers to read about a specific aspect of the meteorological history. It would work much better with them. Figfires Send me a message! 19:23, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 * No, for now since the storm is still active. Wait til it dies when this can better be discussed. YE Pacific Hurricane  19:25, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Since Hector is now dead, we should start discussing subsections again. I personally think that it would make it better. Grammarguruguy (talk) 16:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I could see there being 4 subsections right now. One for the formation, EPAC/strengthening, CPAC/peak intensity, and WPAC/decline and dissipation. Figfires Send me a message! 22:26, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I think they should be titled by event (i.e. "Formation") rather than by basin. Grammarguruguy (talk) 03:20, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * I strongly disgree with the need for subsections, since the MH would just end up as being even more bloated.Jason Rees (talk) 05:19, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
 * What I don’t see is how dividing the MH into subsections would cause bloating. The division would make it easier for readers to access and editors to edit. New content to make each section bigger would not be needed, and it doesn’t seem like dividing would hurt any aspect of the article. Grammarguruguy (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

I don't think that there's enough content for subsections right now. I believe that there should be a Genevieve-like expansion on its meteorological before thinking on subdivisions. ABC paulista (talk) 16:13, 18 August 2018 (UTC)