Talk:Hurricane Hilda (1955)

Todo
Needs more impact. Jdorje 04:14, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

Lack of retirement
There needs to be something about why Hilda was not retired. As I understand it as a decided non-expert, a storm causing this much damage should be almost a dead cert for retirement. If there's stuff available about why it wasn't retired, that really needs to be in the article. Loganberry (Talk) 22:14, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Vandalism?
The current revision of the article credits Hilda as a Category 5 hurricane. Where the heck did that come from? --Dylan620 ( Home •  yadda yadda yadda  •  Ooooohh! ) 00:02, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Fixed. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Funny thing is, that error hadn't been caught for over a month! --Dylan620 ( Home •  yadda yadda yadda  •  Ooooohh! ) 12:44, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Indeed, but non-blatant vandalism tends to stick around a bit longer. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  15:25, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hurricane Hilda (1955). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6CV1scaM6?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.aoml.noaa.gov%2Fhrd%2FLandsea%2FNHR-Cuba.pdf to http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/Landsea/NHR-Cuba.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:10, 6 April 2017 (UTC)