Talk:Hurricane Humberto (1995)

Todo
Looks pretty good for storm that didn't affect land. The storm history should be shortened a bit - it's too long as it is. The unisys reference should be changed to something more official. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 05:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The NOAA's 1995 page doesn't work either as a ref. You should use Hurdat for any records that were never explicitely stated. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 05:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

GA review

 * Well-written - Pass - One problem, though. The storm history is a bit too long. Try cutting it down a bit. Six paragraphs isn't needed for a storm that lasted only a few days.
 * Factually accurate - Pass, though see if there are any non-NOAA sources (unlikely but possible)
 * Broad - Pass (gotta love the fish storm articles, nice and easy)
 * Non-POV/Stable - Pass
 * Images - Pass

Good job Crazy, GA passed. Hurricanehink ( talk ) 16:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 21:08, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Merge
Humberto in 1995 wasn't that meteorologically extraordinary of a storm, it doesn't have any impact on land. --219.79.127.179 (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * you may discuss about it. --219.79.127.179 (talk) 09:33, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I oppose for now, until the 1995 AHS article is complete. 1995 was a busy season, and storms from busy seasons need to be handled differently. I think this article is appropriate, and it was part of a parade of storms. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 15:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't really want to add more content to 1995 AHS at this time, given moving content to the season article would increase its content size to 116kb. YE Pacific Hurricane  15:37, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Merge?
Article is not needed. The only thing notable is that it formed in rapid succession with other storms, that could easily be mentioned elsewhere. Therefore I propose a merge. --HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 20:18, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Support merge No impacts.  SMB9 9thx   my edits  08:22, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge Its only record can easily be mentioned in the season article. 🐔 Chicdat Bawk to me!  12:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)