Talk:Hurricane Humberto (2001)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: –Grondemar 03:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

I did a general copyedit, and fixed a couple of misstated facts, such as the fact that Humberto is actually on the 2013 hurricane list, not the 2011 list. Otherwise, this article in my opinion meets the GA criteria.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * GA PASS. Congratulations!
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * GA PASS. Congratulations!
 * GA PASS. Congratulations!

Thanks, and sorry for taking so long. –Grondemar 04:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks a lot! ♬♩ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 05:22, 17 April 2010 (UTC)