Talk:Hurricane Ileana (2006)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I am going to be reviewing this page which is currently up for Good Article Nomination, I will have the full review up within a few hours. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:07, 5 November 2008 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Expand the lead and needs an overall copyedit.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Expand the Impact section, it's too short. Check Spanish sources for reports of damages.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * An image of its affects would be nice. If one cannot be found, an image relating to the storm during its development/dissipation would also be good.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * An image of its affects would be nice. If one cannot be found, an image relating to the storm during its development/dissipation would also be good.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I am putting this article on hold to allow you to address these points. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Since no attempt has been made to improve this article. I am failing it. Please address the issues above before nominating this article agian. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 15:10, 14 November 2008 (UTC)