Talk:Hurricane Otto (2010)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  intelati  talk 04:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

This should be cool. I'll work on it late UTC today.-- intelati  talk 04:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * please fix the diblinks to Grand Turk and Quadrant
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Nice variety of sources. Fix ref number 48 that link is a 404 error.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Easy to understand and clear
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * All images are PD, No problem there
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Fix the disambig links, and I'll pass it.
 * Fixed. However, ref 48 isn't a dead link for me... Hylian Auree (talk) 22:36, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Ref 27 actually. -- intelati  talk 22:49, 20 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I see, I've fixed that now. :) Hylian Auree (talk) 01:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review.Hylian Auree (talk) 07:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I see, I've fixed that now. :) Hylian Auree (talk) 01:01, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review.Hylian Auree (talk) 07:30, 21 November 2010 (UTC)