Talk:Husk (comics)

Say whu?
"However, she was enslaved by Sugar Man at the Seattle Core for a long time, until Apocalypse's regime fully collapsed." This would be the Sugar-Man who left the core on collossus' boot directly after the gen next storyline finished? Then spent 20 years in Earth-616? Wow, he must have been busy with that commute to enslave Husk back in AoA. Is this wrong, or just marvel being blase about continuity? WookMuff 22:11, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Merge Survey
Merge - Buff was derived from Husk for a made-for-TV Gen X movie. Buff has appeared in no other medium, and had not other appearances outside of this film. The character models are the same. I vote merge. 66.109.248.114 23:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep This entry and the other one are specific that they are separate characters with different abilities. (Emperor 00:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC))


 * No merge as above with Emperor. Has it been stated that Buff and Husk are the same character. StarSpangledKiwi 01:34, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Weak no merge I'm going to go no merge as well, I think the characters are too different even if Buff was a replacement for Husk. -- 69.182.73.240 05:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Just changed my opinion to weak, I could see how this would make sense merged, especially since the entry is so short.
 * No Merge Different names, different powers, different people. Noclevername 21:40, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Discussion closed with no merge.

Fair use rationale for Image:HuskUXM.jpg
Image:HuskUXM.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Xmen AOApokalipse FinalVersion by martegodpopo.jpg
Image:Xmen AOApokalipse FinalVersion by martegodpopo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Main image.
It's change for the sake of improvement. is too cluttered. Both the figure and that unidentified object in the background. Moreover, she doesn't look like Paige in that picture, nor does it capture her personality. The is more representative, and is a full body-shot with a clean background. James-X (talk) 18:34, 27 September 2008 (UTC)


 * As far as the character goes, the two image loook like they depict the came character, just drawn by two different artists.
 * I'd buy the "cluttered" argument if the space object overwhelmed the figure, but it doesn't. The focus is just the character.
 * As for the Larroca art... the general preference is for a "dead on" view, not looking down or up at (unless the character can change size...). So there is an issue there. And there's also how the art has been altered. Frankly, leave the background in since we're using a piece of artwork. Cropping it as tight as you can on the character should be enough. That also eliminates what can be jarring display issue with the "whited" or "blacked out" area. - J Greb (talk) 23:53, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I think we should have an image showing Paige removing her skin; this is what she is known for. Lots42 (talk) 20:25, 22 December 2010 (UTC)