Talk:Hwabyeong

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Hwabyeong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120813080043/http://www.wcprr.org/pdf/04-01/2009.01.1221.pdf to http://www.wcprr.org/pdf/04-01/2009.01.1221.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120813080043/http://www.wcprr.org/pdf/04-01/2009.01.1221.pdf to http://www.wcprr.org/pdf/04-01/2009.01.1221.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120813080043/http://www.wcprr.org/pdf/04-01/2009.01.1221.pdf to http://www.wcprr.org/pdf/04-01/2009.01.1221.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:19, 9 November 2017 (UTC)

Definitely needs more references
I put the references tag in (in my edit summary I was inaccurate: the technical portion of the article contains "few," not "no" references), but as I thought about it I realized how easily the lack of references could be misconstrued in an article about a culturally-linked psychosomatic of psychiatric condition, so I figured the POV tag would get the article some more attention. I am not accusing anyone of intentionally neglecting NPOV when writing/editing this article, but I also believe that if editors do not wish to be accused of that they will then give this article the right kind of attention and provide more and better references (by "better" I not only mean "from peer-reviewed scientific literature and manuals," but also "in English" as this is the English-language wiki; most scientific research is published or at least duplicated in English today so if this condition is well-documented as suggested by some of the notably non-scientific "surveys" referenced in the article's opening, then there should be references that fulfill both meanings of "better references").Ecthelion83 (talk) 19:52, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Malicious modification made by Netto-uyoku
Netto-uyoku believe that  "Hwabyeong (ja:火病, ko:화병) is Korean Culture-bound syndrome, and a lot of Korean people have a disease of Hwabyeong, so Korean people instantly go crazy by mental stress" ''.

But this claim is fake news, and Netto-uyoku libel Korean-Japanese (Korean residents in Japan) using the term of 火病 (en:Hwabyeong), based on their belief that mentioned above, so it must be stopped.

I have deleted the following 3 items, because I think those are malicious modification made by Netto-uyoko.

"Amuk" in "Causes"
Hwabyeong was Culture-bound syndrome of South Korea, which is belong to East Asia, not South Asia.  Amuk is Culture-bound syndrome of South Asia, and is not related to Hwabyeong. Amuk is exactly a disease, not Cause.

"Reference 5" of "中央日報の記事"
The article of "Reference 5" mentioned that  ""35.2% of Korean people has Hwabyeong" , is not consistent with the "4.1% of the general population in a rural area in Korea" mentioned in the article.

"See also" and "Ataque de nervios"
The DSM-IV-TR list of Culture-bound syndrome include both Ataque de nervios and Hwabyeong (see.  DSM-IV-TR list). But the DSM-5 list of Culture-bound syndrome include Ataque de nervios, but dose not include Hwabyeong (see. DSM-5 list). So Hwabyeong has no relationship to Ataque de nervios.

I apologize to Wikipedia users all over the world, especially Korean people, as one of Japanese. --NoNetouyo (talk) 03:17, 15 October 2019 (UTC)