Talk:Hydropolis, Dubai

This article has been fixed very nicely. Although it is a canceled project, it is important to document the ideas behind it. It is a topic, that even thought not built, was still a major topic and a possible consideration of the mid-2000's. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sneakytacos (talk • contribs) 21:29, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Stop spam please!

This project is canceled.

From what I have read recently, the project is NOT canceled, its still underway. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 76.176.213.132 (talk) 01:54, August 23, 2007 (UTC)

The article is utterly wrong. To clarify: this project is NOT close to completion. The reference given in this article points to a news article that does not quote or source its evidence for any completion date. Furthermore the official website of Hydropolis has remained offline for a long period of time and provides no information at all on this project. On top of this there is no visual evidence that any construction has taken place so far at all. The site which was recently photographed by satellite in September 2009 reveals an empty slot of sand with no construction there nor offshore. - This project has been on hold for years and it is NOT near completion at all. - I suggest this article to be moved to rapid deletion as it has neither any credible sources nor does this topic exist.

If you are interested in looking at the site: Look at empty sand slot at 25° 5'2.62"N 55° 8'19.13"E and compare this site with the image given by Hydropolis: http://www.designbuild-network.com/projects/Hydropolis/images/3-location.jpg. Not only is it empty but you can see that since 2007 an entire new high rise area has been built beside it, while Hydropolis has not been completed at all.--Lexxus2010 (talk) 06:59, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed. -Lamarcus (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Delete?
Hydropolis (Dubai) has less money than I do in my wallet. It's not going to be built, ever. It was due to be completed nearly five years ago yet has not started nor will it be doing so.

This article really should get the chop... --78.101.52.117 (talk) 09:04, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.designbuild-network.com/projects/hydropolis/
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 13:19, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 20:24, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

"S/b/:Hydropolis" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect S/b/:Hydropolis and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 March 10 until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 01:18, 10 March 2022 (UTC)