Talk:Hygrophorus bakerensis/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:51, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Nicely done! No generic shuffle whatevah? Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * None! This is a confident fungus that has never had an identity crisis. Sasata (talk) 15:57, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Kewl. Pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:15, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Hygrophorus bakerensis passes this review, and has been promoted to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: