Talk:Hygrophorus eburneus/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:11, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Fine article! Two things:


 * Mention the bioactivity and *cough*slimeaceous*cough* edibility in the lead.
 * Done. Sasata (talk) 19:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Etymology of eburneus :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 06:11, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Added. I also added a bit to the bioactive compounds section (including a custom-made diagram of exotic γ-oxocrotonate structures-thanks Rifleman!); please check to make sure it passes the jargon test :) Sasata (talk) 19:53, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Good job, fellas :) We may pass! Rcej (Robert) - talk 04:50, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Hygrophorus eburneus passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: