Talk:Hyper Car

Overall article quality is pretty bad...
Props to the creator of this page, but the entire page seems very biased. The fact this page exists is pretty weird too, as there is no proper definition of the hypercar. And, since a hypercar is only a subcategory of a sports car, like how a supercar is only a subcategory of a sports car, this page should really only belong as one with either the Supercar article, or the Sports car article, but I understand why this was created. Another page called Hypercar already exists too, so the title should be at least be disambiguated from that page.

The article is okay, but I think serious improvement is a must.

Cheers. Ecks Dey (talk) 08:01, 22 July 2017 (UTC)

This is the dumbest article in the history of Wikipedia
Are articles this bad even allowed? Or has an editor just not noticed it yet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.73.80.220 (talk) 16:07, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

This should probably be deleted
"Do not be discouraged if you think less of supercars after educating yourself on this topic," ... "when the next cooler update is created"

This sounds like a copy paste of a promotional brochure or some 15 year old's essay for school.

Wouldn't it be better to delete this article, and add a short description under the existing supercar article? The entry on super cars is shorter than this, which is absurd. Better to combine the two.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.65.204.55 (talk) 16:45, 12 September 2017 (UTC)

Some references are too opinionated for Wikipedia use.
Come on, seriously? What makes the creator think that opinionated references are available for use on a Wikipedia page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:56A:F398:2100:F1DC:6278:35B3:3F8D (talk) 01:23, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Merge per AfD
Only very basic merge, feel free to add more to supercar from this page's history if well sourced. Thanks, GreyGreenWhy (talk) 06:53, 11 January 2018 (UTC)