Talk:I, a Woman

From the article author

 * The article is crap. but I'm not really up to speed on the complexities of setting up a Wikipedia article, and I'm not going to take the time to learn. The film exists. Do what fix-up it needs. I don't normally read movie reviews, so I've no idea what is actually needed or normal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A Karley (talk • contribs) 13:36, 22 October 2014‎
 * It's done. Really was not too difficult. I apologize for someone else not seeing the article's potential. Check my edits to see how and what was needed, and take a look at MOS:FILM for future film articles. Thank you for your contribution, and be well.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:24, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Huge improvement
Thanks to Schmidt above for his huge improvements. He's obviously someone who knows his way around Wikipedia (I just know my way around information ; when all the alternative systems have been dead for a decade, then the remaining single system may be considered worth learning. Whatever system that is.)

None of the information Schmidt presents conflicts with the little information I had on the film.

I suspect that the "consider for deletion" flag can now be lifted. Aidan Karley (talk) 10:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Not my first rodeo and you are very welcome. See WP:CLOSEAFD. They run their course, and the tag will be removed upon closure. But even if "involved", the nominator can even close it himself under Speedy Keep #1 if no one else feels a delete merited and he sees his concerns have been met. The only "conflict" with your original contribution was the film's release year. Be well,  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 11:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)