Talk:I-II-III (Icon of Coil albums)

Requested move 26 May 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Natg 19 (talk) 20:53, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

I-II-III (Icon of Coil Albums) → I-II-III – Unnecessary disambiguation, no other topic with this name exists. 85.178.198.11 (talk) 03:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose: when remembering the name, confusible with "1-2-3..." and similar. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:56, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Is already linked at 1-2-3, added hatnote for the (highly improbable) case that someone renders "1-2-3" as "I-II-III" when searching. 85.178.198.11 (talk) 05:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose it means one-two-three, and is an alternate rendering of that. It should point to the disambiguation page 1-2-3 (disambiguation) -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 05:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * See above. 85.178.198.11 (talk) 05:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose something needs to be done at WP:AT to give better prominence to examples such as Leeds North West (UK Parliament constituency) and M-185 (Michigan highway). We regularly face RMs such as this.  Where on the net would anyone present an unaccompanied title such as "I-II-III"?  GregKaye 10:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Many of those situations are WP:LOCALCONSENSUS contrary to article title policy. They would not survive such light. --BDD (talk) 19:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Oppose Well there's this article for starters, and WP:SMALLDETAILS would apply.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 11:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.