Talk:I-number

Formatting
This article is poorly formatted. The Wikipedia internals are exposed everywhere. Is this the way things are to be done now?

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 168.7.253.189 (talk) 02:37, 29 November 2006

Jargon creation
What's the point of such "innovations"?

To reinvent the wheel?

To create impressions of scientific innovation where there is none?

Out of the need for changing fashions?

To restrict access to a particular industry by creating industry-specific jargons?

To overwhelm?

Has the generic term hash code lost its applicability somehow over the years?

Or isn't i-number what I think it is: a standardised (or even not) hash code for web content?

If so, why not make this article exactly that short?


 * ''Also consider: buzzword, the opposite of jargon.

– 6birc (talk) 13:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on I-number. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513190900/http://gss.xdi.org/ to http://gss.xdi.org/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080513190900/http://gss.xdi.org/ to http://gss.xdi.org/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041028085925/http://journal.planetwork.net/article.php?lab=reed0704 to http://journal.planetwork.net/article.php?lab=reed0704
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041026015309/http://journal.planetwork.net/ to http://journal.planetwork.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:07, 9 November 2017 (UTC)