Talk:I2 Technologies

Fair use rationale for Image:I2 logo.png
Image:I2 logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Dillard's Case
i2 was found guilty of fraud in a case brought by Dillard's. Even though the deal with Dillard's was for roughly $10M, and there was a limitation of liability built into the EULA, the fraud finding opened up exemplary and punitive damages. Currently, this is $246M. http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/dillards-wins-246-million-in-damages-vs-jda-i2/35888 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.237.236.15 (talk) 02:49, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Who owns it?
Is it JDA, RedRiver, or IBM? Confusing mismatch between the article's header, the history section, and this. MrZaius talk  12:36, 21 February 2013 (UTC)