Talk:IBM Rational Rose

Image copyright problem with Image:RationalSoftware.png
The image Image:RationalSoftware.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --05:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

UML is not a blueprint for anything
but rather, a bunch of drawing techniques for various types of blueprints. Rp (talk) 14:32, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

notable
Is "UML 2 For Dummies book" notable source ? Слишком похожий (talk) 07:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Wrong Date?
The page https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/data/library/techarticle/dm-0801kokkat/index.html says, "On December 16th, 2008, IBM announced that as of Version 7.5.1, Rational Data Architect is renamed to InfoSphere Data Architect to feature its role in InfoSphere Foundation Tools." However, the WikiPedia article says that the "Rational Rose Data Modeler" component of Rational Rose was superceded by Rational Data Architect as of 2011, which is after the date in the announcement on IBM's website. I would add the information from the announcement, but it conflicts with the existing information. Can anyone clarify the existing information? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProtoArmor (talk • contribs) 04:05, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Cleaning Order History
Hello @ Alpha2 5232, I noticed a recent edit was reverted due to "inaccurate sub-header." Could you elaborate, as the banner at the top of the page calls out "This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. The specific problem is:  order history, remove XDE, clarify scope/capabilities of the software. (July 2014)." I added the header to encourage page organization, thanks! Chango23 (talk) 23:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, I understand that I may have been a bit hasty with my decision. My reasoning goes as thus: Of course, adding that header would encourage clean-up, but is it correct to call for that clean-up when all you did was make the page slightly worse? I saw the addition of the header and saw it merely as something to remove.
 * I see now that I was too hasty in my removal of that header until the intention of removal of vandalism. I'm going to take a shot at cleaning up the article right now, instead. Alpha2 5232 (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi, Thank you for clarifying and allowing me to further understand. I appreciate it. Chango23 (talk) 00:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)