Talk:IBeam

It appears that a second (and possibly third) usage of "iBeam" has been introduced into the article without sufficient clarity. It currently reads like something halfway between a disambig page and an actual article. Stellertony the Bookcrosser 18:46, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
 * 1) Bleargh, the third usage turned into blatant advertising. Deleted. Stellertony the Bookcrosser 21:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

i got put on this page looking for I-beam
i got put on this page looking for I-beam--Emesee (talk) 18:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)