Talk:IC4

Weasle Words
I haven't specifically seen this phrase been uttered about this train, but I know this is true about the Metro, which uses material from the same company (Ansalo-Brenda) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.75.167.214 (talk) 00:10, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Walking between trainsets
This contradicts what is said elsewhere in the article, and I can’t see how it would be accomplished, given the design of the train; is this, as I suspect, a misprint for ‘without the possibility’? David Arthur (talk) 19:16, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

The IC4 train in Libya has nothing to do with any problems that have occurred in Denmark. The order was part of an agreement between the then Italian and Libyan government to try to heal the dispute between the two countries has arisen because of the colonial occupation of Libya since Libya was an Italian colony. However, the same information is present in the IC4 page in a section other than me created.--FAM1885 (talk) 23:35, 8 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The problem is that the Libyan IC4, is a train that was produced for danish DSB, paid for by DSB, Built to DSB standard, has a DSB serial number and danish warning stickers. The train-set was produced for DSB at DSB's expense and then given to Libya at the same time as Ansaldo-Breda has been unable to deliver the contracted number of train-sets to DSB. Ansaldo-Breda still needs to deliver about 30 train-sets to DSB. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.191.204.248 (talk) 17:02, 11 June 2013 (UTC)