Talk:IC 167

what contradiction?
? --Arkelweis (talk) 00:46, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Going beyond stub
I'm not sure how much more beyond the information now in the article we can go. The information I presented here along with the references are pretty much the extent of the discussion of this galaxy in the peer reviewed literature so there won't be much more to add until more studies are done, and even then I would suggest that there won't be much more than confirmation of the interaction status of this galaxy. Naturally a photo of the galaxy would be nice but beyond that the information presented is pretty much what is known about the galaxy. To this end I will remove the needs attention from an expert tag. Jjnishiyama (talk) 16:27, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

I am upgrading this article to Start class in WP astronomy as what little there is on this galaxy is referenced and there's not likely to be much more data available on it. Jjnishiyama (talk) 16:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)