Talk:IESE Business School/Archive 1

Fair use rationale for Image:IESE Business School Logo.png
Image:IESE Business School Logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:49, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Unsuitable article
The quality of this article is very low, as it appears to have been edited by someone more interested in promoting this business school than contributing to Wikipedia. Unsourced peacock statements make up most of the text, "Rigurous research on real problems", "The school has become a leading player", "provide the best possible services", "create an important legacy" and "state-of-the-art learning facilities" are just a few of the peacock claims found. I know that it is very common for business schools to use Wikipedia as a means to free advertising, but it surprises me that people don't realise that articles of such a deplorable quality leaves the reader with a much more negative impression than a balanced and neutral article. This is a real problem for Wikipedia, as promoters of business school (and many other things) are more eager to edit with the biased objectives than other editors are, leading to articles of the kind we find here.Jeppiz (talk) 12:34, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I just found that all of this material had been copied and pasted from the school's own website. This is a violation of copy-right, but even if permission was granted, it makes it completely unsuitable. A website for a school is aimed at attracting students and financing and is self-promotional. Wikipedia is not the place to repeat such self-promotional claims, WP:ADVERTISING.