Talk:IFunny

Article rework
individuals, thanks. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 20:36, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Facebook and Twitter's articles are not about those things because the majority of sources about the websites aren't. In this case, when I accepted the draft it seemed to me that the majority of sources are about extremist use of the platform. Please present some reliable sources we could use to rework the article. — Bilorv ( talk ) 21:45, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Since no actual form of violence has been perpetuated by iFunny Inc. and iFunny Inc. is a Public Platform threats of violence by individuals utilizing the platform are not the liability or responsibility of iFunny Inc. Legally speaking a corporations like Facebook, Twitter, Reddit, or iFunny are not held to Publishers Liability for any action taken by their users due to them not being a publisher but rather a platform for users to publish private content. iFunny Inc. is not legally liable or responsible then for the actions, threats, or opinions cited or actioned by its users. It is with this reasoning that iFunny should not be held to some kind of "association of violence". There is no subsequent reasoning to add an association of violence              since the corporation of iFunny Inc. is not directly involved in the perpetuation of violence. We do not hold companies like Twitter, Facebook, or Reddit liable or associated with violence of its members and therefore we should not hold an institution, even                  as small as iFunny liable for violence done by its users. Sources to opinion articles are not relevant to the actual liability of or participation in violence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 40.139.246.194 (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Don't disagree that at minimum the section title should be changed. --PerpetuityGrat (talk) 23:33, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * We're not holding the company liable or responsible, but noting an association documented in reliable sources. The sources in the article associate iFunny with violence. I cannot see evidence from your comment that you have read the sources, and I would like to see specific quotes and references to them if you believe we are misinterpreting them. On the flip side, I am no friend of Twitter, Facebook or Reddit, but we write what reliable sources say and nothing else. If you believe those articles can be improved then find the references, and improve them yourself. — Bilorv ( talk ) 15:28, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Headquarters
I've noticed that the article says that iFunny is Russian, but I don't think that's the case. Note that its parent company is FunCorp, which is based in Cyprus. iFunny is actually just a brand. See these links that show that the company is in Cyprus.



Even if the management at the company consists of people from diverse backgrounds, the fact is that FunCorp is officially registered in Cyprus. Sakinoktor (talk) 22:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Currently we have two sources for "Russian website". The Forbes contributor source (dubious in reliability) just cites the second, but this source―BuzzFeed News―is a bit more robust: [iFunny] is owned by Russian developer Okrujnost. I'm not sure that it matters that the company is formally registered in a tax haven, and we prefer secondary sources over primary sources in most instances. — Bilorv ( talk ) 23:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
 * The Buzzfeed reference confuses the purchaser with the developer. According to the AWS (Amazon) case study iFunny was "Created by Flysoft and launched on April 1, 2011" (https://aws.amazon.com/ru/solutions/case-studies/flysoft-ifunny/). Every current reference points to it being a Cypriot brand owned by FunCorp. However, the original developer in 2011, FlySoft, was based in Russia. Okrujnost LLC bought it from FlySoft in 2012. At some point later the current owner, FunCorp, bought it. Sakinoktor (talk) 15:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * There is a discrepancy between references as to whether iFunny is "Russian" or "Cypriot". Since this is disputed material, I am going to remove the "Russian" claim from the beginning of the article until a consensus is reached. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
 * It's Cyprus-based company owned by Russian expats. Their office staff is exclusively Russian. I know it's Wikipedia, and source "I saw it with my own eyes" isn't credible, but I think it's safe to say that at the very least it was created by Russians and current staff has strong ties to Russia. 176.98.226.170 (talk) 12:41, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Media and Culture Theory - MDC 254
— Assignment last updated by Leslsanchezz (talk) 14:12, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 July 2024
Under developers in this wiki Okrujnost is listed. This company did not develop help in anyway of the development of this app. They instead created an app called ifunnycube with is a music app for Augmented realty OS. This company should be removed from the list. Listed source shows all apps created by said developer. Sources: https://apptopia.com/ios/app/1322349726/intelligence

https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/okrujnost/technology Mrkillerkoala (talk) 23:06, 8 July 2024 (UTC)

Not done: Sources already in this article state that Okrujnost was the owner of iFunny, and I was unable to find a source stating otherwise. The two sources you linked both pull information from apptopia which does not seem to have complete information. Jiltedsquirrel (talk) 01:11, 16 July 2024 (UTC)