Talk:III (Download album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Download-III.jpg
Image:Download-III.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. jonkerz♠ 01:00, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

III (Download album) → III (Download (band) album) — to match Download (band) and to make clear that this is not about downloadable digital content, an album called "III" which may be downloaded. As there are several albums with this generic name, which may be legally or illegally downloaded, the current name is ambiguous. 65.95.15.144 (talk) 04:58, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.


 * Opppose. The name of the band is "Download", not "Download (band)". If the preferred title would be ambiguous and the topic is not the primary one for the preferred title, we use a parenthetical disambiguation phrase. For the band, since "Download" is ambiguous, that would be "(band)". For the album, since "III" is ambiguous, that would be "(album)", but there are two multiple albums, so it is "(Download album)" instead. -- JHunterJ (talk) 15:51, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment the set phrase "download album" is not an album by the band Download, it is an album that is downloadable, the disambiguation phrase itself is therefore ambiguous. 65.95.15.144 (talk) 20:30, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - no, grammatically that would be "downloadable album". In the context of Wikipedia, the current title is perfectly acceptable for disambiguation purposes. – ukexpat (talk) 20:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It's certainly not "Wikipedia ambiguous" anyway. There is no other Wikipedia article on a topic that could expect to have the title "III (Download album)", even if we can hypothesize a topic that might one day have that title. If one day another topic that would get the title "III (Download album)" is created, I suppose this one could become "III (1997 Download album)". -- JHunterJ (talk) 01:51, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose, per JHunterJ. Succinctly put. Also note that disambiguating titles should be as simple as possible. – ukexpat (talk) 17:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Oppose It's fine as it is. The proposed new title is certainly quite confusing. walk victor falktalk 22:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.